Two theories of One

These two went up within a week of each-other.

Basically, a “Unified Theory” is a single theory that would link all forms of physics. Apparently, this is very difficult to do. Albert Einstein spent many years attempting it. So has Stephan Hawking and many other great minds. So far : nothing.

But that didn’t stop these guys!

Joe’s Theory

I contend that the Universe only deals in absolutes. 1 real Universe can only be eternally occurring here and now while travelling through one real infinite dimension, once.
There is no way that real light could ever travel from anywhere at approximately 186,000 mps. Light must be the only stationary substance in the Universe.

O….K.

I wonder how that even works. If light is staying still and we’re moving, how does light works in both directions? I guess I’d need to pledge $25 to find out.

1 is the absolute of number. Eternal is the absolute of duration. Here and now are absolutes of location and time. Infinite is the absolute of distance. Once is the absolute of history.

One (Andrew’s Theory)

“Hi, Kickstarters! My name is Andrew Macauley and I am The Scholar of the Brightest Star.”

Hi Jackass, I’m The Blogger of Perpetual Contempt!
Interphysics is essentially the science of examining the fundamental qualities of existence that are capable of being observed solely through the use of logic, rather than physical experimentation
That’s already got a name. It’s called “Philosophy”. Seriously, that’s pretty much the textbook definition of philosophy. Not that he’d know. I’m not convinced Mr Macauley has ever opened a textbook.

our definition of time is inadequate for describing how time actually unfolds, because our definition requires that the past come before the present, when in actuality, the present must come first for
And he went on like this for pages and pages. Or … I guess he will go on like this, since the past comes after the present?

If we are going to show that all things are one and that there is only one moment, we must first begin by understanding what is wrong with our current definition of time.
Hey! This is the same nonsense Joe was trying to sell us!

Here’s a final thought from The Scholar of the Brightest Star :

So how are they doing?

JoesTheory_backersOneTheory_backers

There’s a certain cosmic beauty in the fact that both of these projects (at the time I wrote this) have exactly one backer.

But here’s what confuses me :

Why are there two of these projects running at the same time?

Besides the obvious irony of two Theories of One, it seems like too much of a coincidence for both of these to have popped up within a week of each-other.

If anyone has any theories or explanations please leave them in the comments, because I’d love to hear them.

  • http://twitter.com/andrewmacauley andrew macauley

    Well, it’s because of synchronicity, the concept that Carl Jung detailed in his studies of the human subconscious. Since past and future don’t exist as objective realities, everything is a result of timing, rather than time, the same way that a film strip geared to run at 60 frames per second displays a frame every 1/60th of a second due to the motion of the reels that display those frames, rather than telling itself when to display frames based on the time a clock relates.

    Because of this, and because of the semi-deterministic nature of the physical universe itself, hotbeds for certain kinds of creativity are created that can be called ‘timing windows’ for those kinds of events (like how Alexander Graham Bell and Elisha Grey patented designs for the first telephone within one hour of each other). Joe and I obviously tapped into the same aspect of our collective subconscious that was allowing for the production of information of this nature, thus each creating projects of a similar theme.

    Hope that helped!

    • KickFailure

      Well, …Thanks for clearing THAT up!

      • Gabriel Holland

        Rubbish.
        The collective unconscious refers to our tendency to use certain motifs and archetypal representations due to the common structures of our brains resulting from evolution.

  • Adam Warlock

    I wonder if both these wonderkins were brought up as indigo kids?