Look, just because “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies” was a best-seller, doesn’t mean that everyone should go around adding zombies to old books!
In fact, I think nobody should do that since it’s probably the least creative or intelligent way to write a book I can possibly imagine.
I’m an athiest, and this is already starting to offend me.
A lot of these don’t even seem like a big deal. Besides a few fundamentalists, would any Christians be shocked at the suggestion that the first plague of Egypt was a red algae bloom instead of literal blood? Who cares? The point is that their water supply became smelly and undrinkable, not that you could bag it and use it for transfusions!
And it goes on like this for pages…
But you know what he barely mentions at all? That’s right : Zombies.
It’s almost like the zombie on the cover was just a trick to get us to buy his preachy book!
Now I am offended!
Edit (5/2/13) : Ha ha! Commenter David Bird points out that this guy needs to brush up on his editing skills.
(It’s also possible that he’s tunneled under a street (or “way”) and writes the book on bases stolen from a local ball park. I’m not ruling anything out.)